safeice.org
  • Home
  • Why Safe Ice Matters
  • Consumer Resources
    • Consumer Information
    • Find Safe Ice
    • Helpful Links
    • IceWatch
    • Myths About Ice
    • Packaged Ice Studies
    • PackagedIce.com
  • Industry Resources
    • Packaged Ice Quality Control Standards
    • How to Inspect an Ice Machine
    • Retail and Wholesale Regulations
  • Newsroom
    • Ice Contamination Reports
    • Press Releases
  • Contact Us

Packaged Ice Studies

Research highlights the exceptional safety standards of IPIA-accredited packaged ice.

The findings are clear: Consumers face significant risks from non-accredited packaged ice, with a concerning number of samples showing unsatisfactory levels of contamination. The studies below reinforce the critical importance of choosing IPIA-accredited ice to ensure safety and quality.

Independent Research & Laboratory Findings
Expand each section to review packaged ice studies spanning over a decade, testing, & key findings.

New Independent Studies Confirm: Packaged Ice Produced Without Industry Standards Can Become Contaminated
University of Manitoba Research & Independent Eurofins Laboratory Testing (2026)
March 17, 2026 - LUTZ, FL - The International Packaged Ice Association (IPIA) today announced the release of two new independent scientific findings - conducted by testing with Eurofins Microbiology Laboratories, Inc. and a study with the University of Manitoba -providing further confirmation of a consistent scientific assessment: when packaged ice is produced without recognized sanitation and quality-control standards, it can become contaminated and pose a potential health risk to consumers.

The new research builds on decades of university and laboratory studies across North America demonstrating that microbiological safety in packaged ice is directly tied to sanitary manufacturing controls, validated water quality, end-product testing, hygienic handling, and regulated processing environments.

New Studies Reinforce Longstanding Scientific Evidence

The University of Manitoba analysis evaluated microbiological indicators and sanitation conditions across different ice-production environments. Consistent with earlier peer-reviewed research, findings show that ice produced and bagged on-site at retail locations or through vending machines may contain unsatisfactory microbial indicators, while ice manufactured in controlled facilities operating under strict standards consistently meets established microbiological limits.

Scientific literature further confirms that freezing alone does not eliminate harmful microorganisms and that contamination risks depend heavily on water quality, equipment sanitation, and human handling during production and packaging.

Independent laboratory testing by Eurofins Microbiology Laboratories, Inc. similarly confirmed that packaged ice produced under validated sanitation programs and hygienic commercial manufacturing conditions remains within accepted microbiological safety thresholds, underscoring the protective value of rigorous production standards, like the IPIA’s industry standards.

Specific Findings from University of Manitoba Study

The Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada conducted research and testing to evaluate packaged ice safety.
  • Half (two of the four) of non-IPIA-accredited brands failed to meet the total coliform standards set by the IPIA with 4.3% and 36.6% of their respective samples not complying, exceeding the acceptable limit of 0 CFU/mL. In contrast, 100% of the samples from the IPIA-accredited brand complied with the standards.

Specific Findings from Eurofins Sample Testing

Eurofins Microbiology Laboratories, Inc. tested packaged ice from over 90 non-IPIA-accredited brands.
  • More than 30 results sampled were found to have results that would have failed the IPIA’s PICQS standards, including high Heterotrophic Plate Counts and presence of coliforms. Three samples had an extremely high coliform presence of over 2400 CFU/mL. The acceptable limit of coliforms is 0 CFU/mL.
  • The fact that the failed samples came from so many different locations shows how widespread this problem is and how each jurisdiction needs to prioritize additional oversight of these facilities.

Protecting Consumers Through Proven Standards

IPIA-member manufacturers follow the Packaged Ice Quality Control Standards (PIQCS), a comprehensive food-safety framework based on federal Good Manufacturing Practices and strengthened with hazard-analysis controls, sanitation verification, and finished-product microbiological testing.

These standards mirror the types of safeguards consumers expect from other regulated food and beverage products and provide critical protection against contamination risks documented in multiple university studies.

Consumer guidance has long emphasized the importance of choosing packaged ice produced under recognized safety programs, including verifying labeling, secure packaging, and manufacturer identification - steps that help ensure the ice was produced under rigorous sanitary controls.

Decades of University Research Show the Same Pattern

Earlier landmark research in Georgia documented unsatisfactory microbial indicators in retail-produced and vending-machine ice, including heterotrophic bacteria in 6% of samples, coliform contamination in 26%, E. coli in 1%, enterococci in 13%, and isolated detections of Salmonella and Enterobacter agglomerans. These results pointed to sanitation failures in unregulated production environments and highlighted the need for improved hygienic controls.

By contrast, no manufactured ice samples produced under IPIA-aligned controls exceeded recommended microbiological limits, demonstrating the effectiveness of structured sanitation and quality-control programs.

Complementary university research in Southern California reached the same conclusion: 19% of on-site packaged ice samples failed microbiological limits, while manufactured and controlled in-store bagged ice showed fully acceptable safety results and no detectable Salmonella.

Researchers also identified staphylococci in 34% of on-site packaged ice, indicating contamination associated with human handling—an issue absent in manufactured ice produced under sanitary controls.

Across regions, methodologies, and time periods, the scientific conclusion is consistent: without enforceable sanitation standards, packaged ice can become contaminated.

Need for Greater Regulatory Oversight

Because ice is legally defined as a food product and frequently consumed directly or in beverages, public-health experts emphasize that it should meet the same safety expectations as drinking water. However, unlike bottled water and many other manufactured foods, packaged-ice production- particularly on-site retail bagging and vending machines - often operates without uniform, enforceable processing standards or consistent regulatory oversight, creating conditions where contamination can occur. 

“These new independent findings confirm what the scientific community has demonstrated for years: when packaged ice is produced without strict sanitation standards, consumers are placed at unnecessary risk,” said Maria Maggio, Executive Director, International Packaged Ice Association. “The solution is clear: stronger oversight and adherence to proven food-safety standards are essential to protect public health."
University of Iowa Study Highlights Need for Oversight of Water & Ice Vending Kiosks
​
University of Iowa (2026)
April 8, 2026 - LUTZ, FL -  The International Packaged Ice Association (IPIA) today called attention to a new peer-reviewed study from the University of Iowa finding that water purchased from for-profit vending kiosks in multiple states contained detectable levels of lead, with at least one location measuring nearly double the threshold deemed acceptable by the Environmental Protection Agency. The IPIA views this finding as further confirmation of a pattern that we have documented repeatedly across packaged ice, water, and vending product categories: when consumable products are sold through unregulated or insufficiently monitored vendors, consumers face avoidable health risks.

This lead study is not an isolated finding. It is part of a consistent and growing body of scientific evidence demonstrating that vending machines, self-service kiosks, and on-site retail vendors operate in regulatory gray areas that leave consumers exposed. The IPIA urges federal and state regulators, industry stakeholders, and consumers to take note.


University of Iowa Study: Key Findings

Published in February 2026, the University of Iowa research examined 20 water and ice kiosks across six states: Kansas, Iowa, Missouri, Oklahoma, Illinois, and Arkansas. Researchers tested for the presence of metals including lead, tin, zinc, and copper:
  • 15 of 20 kiosks tested contained detectable traces of lead.
  • One Kooler Ice kiosk in Baxter Springs, Kansas registered lead at 19.1 parts per billion, nearly double the EPA’s guideline of 10 parts per billion for drinking water.
  • The reverse osmosis treatment used by most kiosks made the resulting water corrosive, causing lead to leach from “lead-free” plumbing components, a combination researchers described as particularly concerning and difficult for consumers to detect on their own.

Lead researcher David Cwiertny, Director of the Center for Health Effects of Environmental Contamination at the University of Iowa, described the findings as a case of “innovation outpacing public policy” and called for greater regulation and monitoring. Lead is a neurotoxin with no safe level of exposure for children; prolonged adult exposure is linked to kidney damage, fertility issues, and certain types of cancer.

A Consistent Pattern: Unregulated Vendors, Avoidable Contamination

The IPIA has documented this same pattern in the packaged ice industry. Independent testing by sampled packaged ice from over 90 non-IPIA-accredited brands and found:

  • More than 30 samples would have failed the IPIA’s Packaged Ice Quality Control Standards (PIQCS), with high Heterotrophic Plate Counts and detected coliforms.
  • Three samples showed coliform levels exceeding 2,400 CFU/mL, far above the acceptable limit of 0 CFU/mL.
  • Failed samples came from a wide geographic distribution, illustrating a systemic problem rooted in the absence of uniform vendor standards.

​Concurrent analysis from the University of Manitoba reinforced these findings: half of non-IPIA-accredited ice brands tested failed to meet total coliform standards, with 4.3% and 36.6% of samples from the failing brands not in compliance. By contrast, 100% of samples from an IPIA-accredited brand met all established limits.

Earlier university studies in Georgia and Southern California revealed the same pattern. In Southern California, 19% of on-site packaged ice samples failed microbiological limits, and staphylococci were detected in 34% of on-site samples, a contamination indicator absent entirely from manufactured ice produced under controlled standards. Georgia research identified coliform contamination in 26% of samples, E. coli and isolated detections of Salmonella from retail-produced and vending machine ice.


In every study, whether examining ice or water, microbial contamination or lead, kiosks or vending machines, the conclusion is the same: products sold through vendors operating without enforceable, validated safety standards present elevated health risks to consumers.

What Consumers Should Know When Purchasing from Vendors and Vending Machines

The IPIA urges consumers to exercise care when purchasing consumable products from kiosks, vending machines, or on-site retail vendors. The following steps can help reduce risk:

  • Look for visible labeling that identifies the manufacturer, production facility, and applicable safety certifications.
  • When purchasing packaged ice, look for the IPIA seal or verify that the brand follows the Packaged Ice Quality Control Standards (PIQCS).
  • Exercise caution with standalone kiosks or self-service machines that lack clear brand identification, visible regulatory certification, or accessible maintenance records.
  • Be especially cautious when purchasing for children or vulnerable populations — both lead and microbial contaminants carry heightened health risks for these groups.
  • If concerned about possible lead exposure from a water or ice kiosk, contact your county public health official to discuss testing options.

The Regulatory Case Is Clear: Stronger Oversight Is Needed

Because ice is legally defined as a food product and is frequently consumed directly or in beverages, public health experts have long emphasized that it should meet the same safety expectations as drinking water. The University of Iowa lead study confirms that water sold for consumption through vending kiosks deserves exactly the same scrutiny. Across multiple independent studies spanning different product types, geographies, and methodologies, the scientific evidence converges on a single conclusion:

Without enforceable standards and consistent oversight, contamination happens — and consumers bear the consequences.


The IPIA has advocated for greater regulatory oversight of packaged ice production for years and is calling for equivalent scrutiny to be applied to the broader category of vending machine and kiosk-based consumable products. The University of Iowa lead study is a valuable and important contribution to this record and a sobering reminder that the regulatory gap has real-world consequences for real people.
​

“The University of Iowa’s findings on lead in water kiosks are troubling, but they are not surprising to those of us who have been tracking contamination risks across consumable product vendors. We have seen this pattern before — in ice from unregulated vending machines, in on-site bagging operations, and now in water kiosks marketed as a premium alternative to tap water. The data consistently points to the same conclusion: when vendors operate without enforceable safety standards and meaningful oversight, consumers pay the price. The IPIA calls on regulators at every level to close these gaps and urges all consumers to be vigilant about where and how they purchase consumable products,” said Maria Maggio, Executive Director, International Packaged Ice Association.

Cal Poly Researchers Find Contamination in Ice Which is Not Produced to Industry Standards
California Polytechnic State University (2016)
The most comprehensive study on packaged ice safety to date has been conducted in California, comparing ice produced by members of the International Packaged Ice Association (IPIA) to ice manufactured without the IPIA’s industry-leading standards. The results reveal a concerning risk to consumers, as a significant amount of non-IPIA packaged ice in California was found to have unsatisfactory levels of contamination.
The study, conducted by California State Polytechnic University, emphasizes the importance of awareness for both retailers and consumers when choosing packaged ice. Researchers collected and analyzed 156 samples from stores across Southern California, comparing ice produced on-site at retail locations with ice manufactured by IPIA members. The findings highlight the critical role of the IPIA’s Packaged Ice Quality Control Standards, which set the benchmark for safety and sanitation in the packaged ice industry.
When it comes to packaged ice, the IPIA Seal of Accreditation is your assurance of quality and safety.
Picture
The latest findings from the study conducted by Cal Poly demonstrate troubling findings about the quality of packaged ice produced at many retail locations:

  • The presence and absence of molds/yeasts colonies were noted and the results showed 56% of the non-accredited packaged ice samples to be positive for yeasts/molds growth
  • A staggering 19% of the non-accredited packaged ice samples produced did not meet the IPIA/PIQCS microbiological limit at 500 total plate counts (TPC) per ml and absence of coliform/E. coli.
  • Staphylococci (the source of staph infections) were found in 34% of the non-accredited packaged ice samples, implying most likely contaminations by the packaging workers. 
  • ​All bags manufactured by the IPIA showed 100% acceptable rates.
UGA Study Reveals Alarming Risks of Non-IPIA-Accredited Packaged Ice Contamination
University of Georgia (2014)
A study by researchers at the University of Georgia has uncovered concerning risks associated with packaged ice produced by retailers and self-serve vending machines. With millions of pounds of ice being sold through these sources, the findings reveal that a significant portion of this ice could pose health risks to consumers.

The study examined the microbiological quality of packaged ice from retail locations such as convenience stores, liquor stores, fast-food restaurants, and gas stations, as well as ice produced by self-serve vending machines. These were compared to ice manufactured under the International Packaged Ice Association’s (IPIA) rigorous Packaged Ice Quality Control Standards (PIQCS). The results clearly indicate that many retailers and vending machines are failing to follow proper sanitary practices in ice production and packaging.

While IPIA-accredited ice produced under the PIQCS standards was free of harmful bacteria, more than 25% of samples of non-accredited ice from retail and vending sources were found to have unsatisfactory levels of contamination. According to the report, “Consumers who buy this ice (non-IPIA) should also be educated about the risk they take by purchasing this product and ways they can also prevent cross-contamination in their homes.”

The researchers further noted, “No coliforms or E. coli were detected in the ice from manufacturing plants (IPIA), which indicates good sanitary, hygienic practices may have been in place.”​

Picture
Picture
The IPIA described the findings as groundbreaking: “The study demonstrates that the quality of packaged ice produced at retail locations and self-serve vending machines is suspect. Where contamination was found, it could indicate a contaminated water source, mold or slime in the ice machine, unsanitized ice scoops, unsanitary packaging processes, or unhygienic handling by staff. These conditions have been a concern for a long time, and now the study confirms it.” They added, “On the other hand, the study clearly shows that ice manufactured to IPIA’s stringent sanitary standards is clean and safe for consumers.”

This study underscores the importance of choosing IPIA-accredited packaged ice to ensure the highest standards of safety and quality.

Summary of Previous Studies on Packaged Ice Safety
Research over several decades has examined ice as a potential vehicle for bacteria, pathogens, and cross-contamination.

2017

Clemson University

The human handling of ice and lemons can easily cause them to become contaminated with bacteria and other pathogens. Ice is a particularly effective conveyor of bacteria. When hands were contaminated with E. coli, the bacteria were transferred to the ice 100 percent of the time.

2017

BBC News

Samples of iced drinks from Starbucks and two other UK chains, Costa Coffee and Caffe Nero, contained varying levels of the bacteria.

2017

Beykent University

Transfer of bacteria from contaminated ice holding bins or scoops to ice may be an issue. This study reported finding E. coli in 6.7% of ice samples, and 22% of ice chest samples, but no positive E. coli from water samples used to make the ice.

2016

California State Polytechnic University

Samples of packaged ice produced on-site at retail locations in California were collected, analyzed, and compared with packaged ice produced by members of the International Packaged Ice Association (IPIA). A staggering 56% of the on-site packaged ice samples were positive for yeasts/molds growth, and 19% of the packaged ice samples produced on-site did not meet the IPIA/PIQCS microbiological limit at 500 TPC per ml and absence of coliform/E. coli.

2016

UNLV

Ice and water samples were collected from Las Vegas, Nevada food establishments and analyzed using EPA standard methods. A total of 19 of the 28 samples collected exceeded the EPA limit for HPC, and two out of 14 ice samples also contained E. coli.

2016

Canadian Institute of Public Health Inspectors

To investigate the microbiological quality and handling practices of ice served in selected food premises in downtown Toronto, Ontario, 64 ice samples were collected. Five samples, 7.8%, tested positive for total coliforms, all of which were sampled from the customer service areas.

2014

University of Georgia

Researchers in Georgia examined the microbiological quality of packaged ice produced and bagged at retail locations and compared those results with ice produced by manufacturers that comply with the IPIA's standards. Over 25 percent of the ice samples from retail store producers and self-serve vending machines showed unsatisfactory levels of contamination.

2011

Science Direct

100 ice samples were collected in Epirus, Greece, and evaluated for their physical, chemical and microbiological properties. Total and fecal coliforms and spores of C. perfringens were detected in one third of the samples.

2004

Federal University of Sao Paulo

Diarrheagenic E. coli has been found in commercial ice produced in Brazil. In the study of the microbiological quality of commercial ice, 50 Escherichia coli isolates belonging to different serotypes were found.

2002

Rutgers University

During food preparation, bacteria on hands can be transferred to raw foods from hands and indirectly from other surfaces. This study simulated factors that influence the levels of bacteria on foodservice workers' hands.

2002

Adolfo Lutz Institute of Sao Paulo

To evaluate the microbiological content of commercial ice and ice used to refrigerate fish and seafood, 60 ice samples collected at six different retail points in the city of Araraquara, SP, Brazil, were studied. The presence of high numbers of coliforms and pathogenic strains suggested that commercial ice and ice used to refrigerate fish and seafood may represent a potential hazard to the consumer in the community.

2000

United Kingdom

In a survey of over 3,500 samples of ice used to cool drinks from retail and catering premises examined, the microbiological quality of ice used to cool drinks was poorer when melt water was present in the ice buckets. Ice used in food displays was more contaminated than ice used to cool drinks, with 23% containing coliforms.

1999

University of Florida

In a statewide survey, ice samples purchased at retail stores were evaluated for labeling information and microbiological, chemical, and physical quality. One ice sample exceeded the state regulatory limit for aerobic plate count. Yeasts and molds were detected in 12% of the samples.

1998

Fendler, Dolan & Williams

Cross contamination in food service may play an important role in foodborne illness. Ice is a known transmission vector of pathogenic microorganisms in human foodborne illness.

1997

Journal of Hospital Infection

A survey was undertaken in response to a report of a clinical infection which had been related to an ice-making machine on a hospital ward. A detailed study of the ice microflora of 27 ice-making machines was performed. Escherichia coli was detected in three samples but in very low numbers.

1994

Iowa

A study in Iowa showed 8 samples, 36%, exceeding the TPC limit, 15, 68%, with positive coliforms, and 13, 59%, with positive mold species. All of the unsatisfactory samples did not comply with the IPIA's PIQCS guideline.

1992

The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Contaminated ice was a prominent transmission vector for spreading the 1991 cholera epidemic in Peru causing 7,922 illnesses, 17 deaths and also expanding throughout Latin America.

1990

Center for Disease Control

From 1986 to 1988, 24 states and Puerto Rico reported 50 outbreaks of illness due to water that people intended to drink, affecting 25,846 persons. A large multistate outbreak caused by commercially produced ice made from contaminated well water caused illness with Norwalk-like virus among an estimated 5,000 persons.

1988

American Thoracic Society

Between October 15 and November 18, 1985, 5 patients on a medical ward of the Albany, VA Medical Center became colonized with Mycobacterium fortuitum. Exposure to ice from the ice machine, but not to potable water, was associated with colonization with M. fortuitum.

1986

Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Thirty-two clinical specimens submitted to the laboratory during a 12-month period from July 1980 to June 1981 were reported to be culture-positive for Mycobacterium gordonae, an organism generally found in soil and water.

1985

Cambridge University Press

The cold water dispensers of 14 hospital ice machines were cultured monthly over a 1-year period. Positive cultures for Legionella bacteria were obtained from 8 of 14 dispensers. Although no epidemiologic link to disease was made, these primary water sources serve as possible reservoirs for disease.

What the Research Shows

Across university studies and independent laboratory testing, packaged ice produced without recognized quality control standards has repeatedly demonstrated higher contamination risks. Consumers can help protect themselves by choosing IPIA-accredited packaged ice displaying the Seal of Accreditation.
Picture
find safe ice
For more information about IPIA and safe ice, visit www.packagedice.com.
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • Home
  • Why Safe Ice Matters
  • Consumer Resources
    • Consumer Information
    • Find Safe Ice
    • Helpful Links
    • IceWatch
    • Myths About Ice
    • Packaged Ice Studies
    • PackagedIce.com
  • Industry Resources
    • Packaged Ice Quality Control Standards
    • How to Inspect an Ice Machine
    • Retail and Wholesale Regulations
  • Newsroom
    • Ice Contamination Reports
    • Press Releases
  • Contact Us